Draft based on machine findings and manual checkpoints
This is an example
Tallene og funnene under er fra et oppdiktet nettsted, men
the template is the real one - this is what the statement looks like when you test your own website. The text under each breached criterion is the one we write for you, ready to paste into uustatus.no.
Automatically generated draft from the scan. The binding
the statement for the public sector is published via uustatus.no
- use this as your basis and fill in the fields marked [ … ].
About this statement
Organisation
[Virksomhetens navn]
Website / solution
https://demo.kommune.no
Standard
WCAG 2.1 level AA (the Norwegian ICT accessibility regulations)
Vurderingsmetode
Machine findings from this tool + manual assessment of criteria marked «Should be checked» or «Needs manual review»
Dato for vurdering
2026-07-27
Pages vurdert
3
Conformance status - ready for professional review
The website is partially compliant with the Norwegian accessibility regulations for ICT.
9 of 48 criteria in the regulations are breached.
Before you publish: 26 criteria cannot be decided by machine and must be assessed by you before the statement is published. The number above may change once they are.
Sign in at uustatus.no using your organisation access.
Go through the breached criteria below - they are grouped by principle, as in the form.
Copy the text we have written into the field «Content that breaches the criterion», and correct it where you know more than we do.
Answer the questions under «Criteria you must assess yourselves». Then the statement is complete.
The status levels are the Norwegian authority's own: samsvar (all relevant level A and AA criteria are met), delvis samsvar (de fleste er oppfylt),
not compliant (the majority are not met). 1.2.4 Captions (Live) is not part of the Norwegian regulations, and is therefore not among the 48 criteria.
What the breaches mean for users
The breaches we found particularly affect these groups:
Kognisjon
Motorikk
Screen reader
Svaksyn
Keyboard
The groups are derived from the actual findings, not from a generic list. Each criterion below has its own sentence on the impact for users.
Content that breaches the criteria
Bare verifiable findings appear here: machine rules, our own rules, behaviour tests in the browser and tests across pages.
Prinsipp 1. Perceivable
1.1.1 Non-text Content Level A
Content that breaches the criterion
We found 1 instance on 1 of 3 pages tested. Images must have alternate text. The image has no alt attribute, or an empty alt without being marked as decorative. Affected pages: /kontakt. Impact on users: Users who have the page read aloud lose the information the image carries — at worst the screen reader announces the file name instead.
See the finding behind this (1 rule)
1× Images must have alternate text
machine evidence <img src="radhus.jpg">
1.3.1 Info and Relationships Level A
Content that breaches the criterion
We found 1 instance on 1 of 3 pages tested. Form elements must have labels. The form element has no associated <label> or aria-label. Affected pages: /skjema/barnehage. Impact on users: Screen readers do not announce headings, lists and tables correctly. The user loses the structure and has to read everything in sequence.
See the finding behind this (1 rule)
1× Form elements must have labels
machine evidence <input type="text" name="fnr">
1.3.5 Identify Input Purpose Level AA
Content that breaches the criterion
We found 1 instance on 1 of 3 pages tested. Identify input purpose. The email field is missing autocomplete="email". Affected pages: /skjema/barnehage. Impact on users: The browser and assistive technology cannot fill the fields in automatically, so users with motor or cognitive difficulties have to type everything themselves.
We found 1 instance on 1 of 3 pages tested. Elements must have sufficient color contrast. The contrast between text and background is too low. Minimum 4.5:1 for normal text, 3:1 for large text. Affected pages: /. Impact on users: Text with too little contrast is hard or impossible to read for partially sighted users, for older users, and for anyone in bright light.
See the finding behind this (1 rule)
1× Elements must have sufficient color contrast
machine evidence <button class="cta">Apply for a place</button>
Prinsipp 2. Operable
2.4.1 Bypass Blocks Level A
Content that breaches the criterion
We found 1 instance on 1 of 3 pages tested. Keyboard users must be able to skip repeated navigation. There is no skip-navigation link at the top of the page. Affected pages: /. Impact on users: Screen reader and keyboard users have to go through the whole menu again on every page before they reach the content.
See the finding behind this (1 rule)
1× Keyboard users must be able to skip repeated navigation (WCAG 2.4.1).
machine evidence <body>
2.4.4 Link Purpose (In Context) Level A
Content that breaches the criterion
We found 1 instance on 1 of 3 pages tested. Link purpose. 2 links are called «Les mer» but lead to different places (/info, /kontakt). The name cannot tell the user where the link goes - and a screen reader user moving between links hears exactly the same text. Affected pages: /skjema/barnehage. Impact on users: Links such as «read more» or «click here» say nothing when the screen reader announces the links on their own, without the surrounding text.
See the finding behind this (1 rule)
1× Link purpose
machine evidence <a href="/info">Les mer</a>
2.4.7 Focus Visible Level AA
Content that breaches the criterion
We found 1 instance on 1 of 3 pages tested. The focus indicator is required for keyboard navigation. The CSS removes focus (outline:none/0) without a visible :focus-visible replacement. Affected pages: /. Impact on users: The keyboard user cannot see where on the page they are, and navigates blind.
See the finding behind this (1 rule)
1× The focus indicator is required for keyboard navigation
machine evidence a:focus{outline:none}
Prinsipp 3. Understandable
3.2.3 Consistent Navigation Level AA
Content that breaches the criterion
We found 1 instance on 1 of 3 pages tested. The main menu must have the same order on every page. «Tjenester» and «Politikk» swap places compared with forsiden. Affected pages: /kontakt. Impact on users: The menu is in a different order from page to page, so the user has to get their bearings again every time.
See the finding behind this (1 rule)
1× The main menu must have the same order on every page (WCAG 3.2.3).
machine evidence <nav>
Prinsipp 4. Robust
4.1.2 Name, Role, Value Level A
Content that breaches the criterion
We found 1 instance on 1 of 3 pages tested. Form elements must have labels. The form element has no associated <label> or aria-label. Affected pages: /skjema/barnehage. Impact on users: The screen reader cannot say what an element is or what state it is in, so the user does not know what they are operating.
See the finding behind this (1 rule)
1× Form elements must have labels
machine evidence <input type="text" name="fnr">
Criteria you must assess yourselves (26)
These criteria cannot be decided by machine. We therefore do not claim they are met. Answer the question, and enter the answer in uustatus.
1.2.1 Audio-only and Video-only (Prerecorded)Level ADoes the website have audio recordings, or video without sound? Then there must be a text alternative giving the same information.
If the criterion is breached: If the content is audio only, it is lost to deaf and hard-of-hearing users. If it is video without sound, it is lost to blind and partially sighted users.
1.2.2 Captions (Prerecorded)Level ADoes the website have video where someone speaks? Then the video must be captioned.
If the criterion is breached: Deaf and hard-of-hearing users miss what is said in the video. Captions also help everyone watching with the sound off.
1.2.5 Audio Description (Prerecorded)Level AADoes the website have video where something is shown without being said out loud? Then audio description is needed.
If the criterion is breached: Blind and partially sighted users miss what is only shown visually in the video and never said out loud.
1.3.2 Meaningful SequenceLevel AIs the content read aloud in the same order as it is shown? Check columns and content moved with CSS in particular.
If the criterion is breached: The content is read aloud in a different order than it is shown, and the meaning falls apart.
1.3.3 Sensory CharacteristicsLevel ADo any instructions refer only to where something is on screen, what shape it has, or what colour it is - instead of what it is called?
If the criterion is breached: Instructions that only point to where something is, what shape it has or what colour it is are useless to anyone who cannot see the screen.
1.4.1 Use of ColorLevel AIs colour used on its own to convey something - red fields on errors, for example, or links in running text that stand out by colour alone?
If the criterion is breached: Information given by colour alone is lost to colour-blind users, and to anyone who has the page read aloud.
1.4.5 Images of TextLevel AAIs there text placed as an image - posters, quotes, prices or campaigns made as graphics?
If the criterion is breached: Text inside an image goes blurry when enlarged, and cannot be read aloud, translated or adapted by the user.
1.4.11 Non-text ContrastLevel AA
If the criterion is breached: Buttons, icons, form borders and graphics with weak contrast become invisible to partially sighted users, who then cannot see what is usable.
1.4.13 Content on Hover or FocusLevel AA
If the criterion is breached: Content that appears on hover cannot be dismissed or reached, and covers what the user is trying to read.
2.1.4 Character Key ShortcutsLevel AAre there shortcuts using a single letter or character, without a way to switch them off or remap them?
If the criterion is breached: Single-character shortcuts fire unintentionally from voice control and from involuntary key presses.
2.2.1 Timing AdjustableLevel AAre there time limits - automatic sign-out, a basket that empties, a deadline in a form - that the user cannot extend?
If the criterion is breached: Users who need more time lose what they have filled in when the time runs out without warning.
2.3.1 Three Flashes or Below ThresholdLevel AIs there animation, video or an effect that flashes more than three times per second?
If the criterion is breached: Rapidly flashing content can trigger epileptic seizures.
2.4.3 Focus OrderLevel A
If the criterion is breached: The tab order jumps unpredictably around the page, and the user loses track of where they are.
2.4.5 Multiple WaysLevel AAAre there at least two ways to find content on the website - search or a site map in addition to the menu, for example?
If the criterion is breached: Users who cannot find their way in the menu have no other route to the content, such as search or a site map.
2.4.6 Headings and LabelsLevel AADo the headings and labels actually describe the content that follows them?
If the criterion is breached: Vague headings and labels make it hard to find your way, and to understand what a field should contain.
2.5.1 Pointer GesturesLevel ADoes anything require swiping, pinching or drawing with a finger, without a simple alternative?
If the criterion is breached: Functions that require swiping, pinching or drawing with a finger are unavailable to anyone with reduced fine motor control.
2.5.2 Pointer CancellationLevel AAre actions triggered the moment the finger touches the screen, with no way to move the finger away and cancel?
If the criterion is breached: The action fires the moment the user touches the screen, with no way to move the finger away and cancel a mistaken press.
2.5.4 Motion ActuationLevel ADoes any function require the device to be shaken, tilted or moved?
If the criterion is breached: Functions that require the device to be shaken or tilted are unavailable to anyone whose device is fixed in place.
3.1.2 Language of PartsLevel AAAre there passages, quotes or expressions in a language other than the main language of the page?
If the criterion is breached: Passages in another language are read aloud with the wrong pronunciation, and become hard to understand.
3.2.1 On FocusLevel ADoes anything change merely because an element receives keyboard focus - a menu opens, a form submits, the page changes?
If the criterion is breached: Something changes merely because the user tabbed to an element, and the user loses their bearings.
3.2.2 On InputLevel ADoes the form submit, or the page change, by itself when the user fills in or changes a field?
If the criterion is breached: The page changes or the form submits by itself while the user is filling it in, without being asked to.
3.3.1 Error IdentificationLevel AIs the user told clearly, in text, what is wrong and in which field?
If the criterion is breached: The user is not told what is wrong in the form, and cannot get any further.
3.3.2 Labels or InstructionsLevel ADoes every field have a visible label, and are there instructions where the format is not obvious?
If the criterion is breached: Fields without labels make it impossible to know what to fill in, especially for screen reader users.
3.3.3 Error SuggestionLevel AAIs the user given a suggestion for how to fix the error - not just told that something is wrong?
If the criterion is breached: The user is told that something is wrong, but not how to fix it, and gives up.
3.3.4 Error Prevention (Legal, Financial, Data)Level AACan binding submissions - payment, an application, deletion of data - be reviewed, confirmed or undone?
If the criterion is breached: Binding submissions cannot be checked or undone, and a mistake has financial or legal consequences for the user.
4.1.3 Status MessagesLevel AAAre status messages announced by screen readers - «saved», «3 results», error messages that appear without the page reloading?
If the criterion is breached: Messages such as «saved» or «3 results» are never announced, so the screen reader user believes nothing happened.
Testing and assessment of the website
We have tested and assessed the website ourselves.
Website
https://demo.kommune.no
Dato for testen
2026-07-27
Pages tested
3
Standard
WCAG 2.1 level AA - 48 criteria in the Norwegian regulations
How we tested: established machine rules (axe-core) and our own rules against the code, behaviour tests in a real browser (keyboard navigation, visible focus, 200 % text, 320 px screen width), tests across the pages (consistent navigation and identification), and deterministic checks of the judgement-based criteria where they can be measured. No AI and no external language model is used. Criteria that cannot be decided by machine are listed above, not guessed at.
Complaints
Do you experience errors or shortcomings in the accessibility of the website? Contact us first:
[Contact email or a link to a feedback form] · [Phone]
If you do not get a satisfactory answer, you can complain to
Diskrimineringsnemnda, the Norwegian tribunal that handles user complaints about failures to meet ICT accessibility requirements.
Digitaliseringsdirektoratet - the Norwegian Authority for Universal Design of ICT
(uutilsynet) is the supervisory authority and enforces the regulations. It does not handle individual user complaints; Diskrimineringsnemnda does.
Teknisk samsvarsvurdering fra skanningen
–
No conformance level
The tool cannot give an automatic conformance conclusion. See the machine findings and manual checkpoints below.
URL skannet
https://demo.kommune.no
Dato skannet
2026-07-27
Pages checked
3
Machine findings
8
Needs review
0
Viktig merknad: The machine tests document technical findings that must be verifiable in the DOM, CSS, HTTP or actual browser behaviour. Criteria requiring judgement are marked for professional review before publication.
13
Ingen machine findings
25
Should be checked
6
Serious machine findings
4
Needs review manuelt
Detaljert kriteriumstatus – WCAG 2.1 A og AA
Krit.
Niv.
Kriterium
Status
Findings
1.1.1
A
Non-text content
Serious machine findings
1 problem(er)
1.2.1
A
Audio-only and video-only (prerecorded)
Needs review manuelt
–
1.2.2
A
Captions (prerecorded)
Should be checked
✓
1.2.5
AA
Audio description (prerecorded)
Needs review manuelt
–
1.3.1
A
Info and relationships
Serious machine findings
1 problem(er)
1.3.2
A
Meaningful sequence
Should be checked
✓
1.3.3
A
Sensory characteristics
Should be checked
✓
1.3.4
AA
Orientation
Ingen machine findings
✓
1.3.5
AA
Identify input purpose
Should be checked
1 problem(er)
1.4.1
A
Use of color
Should be checked
✓
1.4.2
A
Audio control
Ingen machine findings
✓
1.4.3
AA
Contrast (minimum)
Serious machine findings
1 problem(er)
1.4.4
AA
Resize text
Ingen machine findings
✓
1.4.5
AA
Images of text
Should be checked
✓
1.4.10
AA
Reflow
Ingen machine findings
✓
1.4.11
AA
Non-text contrast
Should be checked
✓
1.4.12
AA
Text spacing
Ingen machine findings
✓
1.4.13
AA
Content on hover or focus
Should be checked
✓
2.1.1
A
Keyboard
Ingen machine findings
✓
2.1.2
A
No keyboard trap
Ingen machine findings
✓
2.1.4
A
Character key shortcuts
Should be checked
✓
2.2.1
A
Timing adjustable
Should be checked
✓
2.2.2
A
Pause, stop, hide
Ingen machine findings
✓
2.3.1
A
Three flashes or below threshold
Needs review manuelt
–
2.4.1
A
Bypass blocks
Serious machine findings
1 problem(er)
2.4.2
A
Page titled
Ingen machine findings
✓
2.4.3
A
Focus order
Should be checked
✓
2.4.4
A
Link purpose (in context)
Should be checked
1 problem(er)
2.4.5
AA
Multiple ways
Should be checked
✓
2.4.6
AA
Headings and labels
Should be checked
✓
2.4.7
AA
Focus visible
Serious machine findings
1 problem(er)
2.5.1
A
Pointer gestures
Should be checked
✓
2.5.2
A
Pointer cancellation
Should be checked
✓
2.5.3
A
Label in name
Ingen machine findings
✓
2.5.4
A
Motion actuation
Should be checked
✓
3.1.1
A
Language of page
Ingen machine findings
✓
3.1.2
AA
Language of parts
Should be checked
✓
3.2.1
A
On focus
Should be checked
✓
3.2.2
A
On input
Should be checked
✓
3.2.3
AA
Consistent navigation
Should be checked
1 problem(er)
3.2.4
AA
Consistent identification
Ingen machine findings
✓
3.3.1
A
Error identification
Should be checked
✓
3.3.2
A
Labels or instructions
Should be checked
✓
3.3.3
AA
Error suggestion
Should be checked
✓
3.3.4
AA
Error prevention (legal, financial, data)
Needs review manuelt
–
4.1.1
A
Parsing
Ingen machine findings
✓
4.1.2
A
Name, role, value
Serious machine findings
1 problem(er)
4.1.3
AA
Status messages
Should be checked
✓
Status explanations
Status
Betydning
Ingen machine findings
The scanner found no violations in the deterministic tests for this criterion. Any judgement-based parts remain for professional review.
Should be checked
The criterion has a partial, heuristic or AI-based assessment, or findings of low to moderate severity. Professional review is recommended.
Serious machine findings
The scanner found critical or serious technical findings that should be fixed or verified.
Needs review manuelt
The criterion requires human judgement, media understanding or domain and transaction context.
Exemptions you must assess
No scanner can fill in these two fields of the statement - they require knowledge of the organisation and the content. Breaches of the criteria are further up, under «Content that breaches the criteria».
C. Disproportionate burden
An exemption is allowed when the requirements impose a burden that prevents the organisation from carrying out its core tasks. The assessment looks at the effect on users, the nature of the organisation, costs, size and resources. If you claim this, it must be justified in the statement.
[List content you claim a disproportionate burden for, with justification - or «Not applicable»]
D. Content outside the scope of the regulations
[For example third-party content you do not control, or live media - or «Not applicable»]